In which situation would you typically prioritize using an 81mm mortar over artillery?

Prioritizing the use of an 81mm mortar over artillery in the context of providing indirect fire cover for infantry is appropriate due to the 81mm mortar's characteristics and role on the battlefield. The 81mm mortar is designed for close support, offering soldiers the ability to deliver timely and accurate fire within a short range while maintaining flexibility in a mobile environment.

In infantry operations, the mortar can quickly respond to the changing dynamics of the battlefield, providing immediate fire support to units that are engaged with the enemy. Its relatively lighter weight and portability enable infantry units to maneuver with the mortar more effectively than heavier artillery systems. This mobility is crucial in scenarios where infantry need to suppress enemy positions or provide a quick response to threats, making the mortar a vital asset for close support.

When looking at other options, aspects like close air support tend to be more effective with aircraft that can engage from a distance and often cover larger areas with precision from the air. Securing a perimeter usually involves fortifications and typically doesn't require indirect fire support as a priority, while counter-intelligence operations focus more on information and intelligence gathering rather than direct engagement with enemy forces, where mortars would not be the primary asset employed. Thus, the prioritization of the 81mm